‘Friendly’ Atheism

Apparently, the solution to having someone being threatened and stalked on your forum is to…. ban the person being threatened and stalked.


Love how they forgot to delete the actual threats.  No, no, apparently saying you intend to ‘hook someone’s nethers up to a car battery’ as punishment for disagreeing with you is a-okay by Hemant’s standards, but pointing out someone has no clue what drinking laws are and how binding arbitration actually works is totally banworthy.


© 2014, Within this mind. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogosphere
  • Fark
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter

About Kinda Strange

I am a student at the University of Phoenix majoring in information technology. This is where I come to babble incoherently…err…make notes, talk about things that catch my interest, share ideas, etc...
This entry was posted in Rants. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to ‘Friendly’ Atheism

  1. Hat StealerNo Gravatar says:

    I wondered why there were all those deleted comments on the Twin City Diocese post.

    Sorry to hear that.

  2. splendidNo Gravatar says:

    Hey, WTM, did you say that you had been blocked from TFA? He accidentally banned me last week, because the script on the site banned for keywords only, and I used the wrong keyword when mocking someone.

    I see that your comments still exist on his site, so, you can’t have been banned the way I was. At any rate, I suggest, if you want to be unblocked, send TFA an email and maybe you can get it worked out. I miss your contributions.

  3. Kinda StrangeNo Gravatar says:

    Banning may have been ‘accidental’. Deleting almost two months worth of posts? Not so much.